Scoop Election 08: edited by Gordon Campbell


Gordon Campbell's blog updates are now published at Werewolf.co.nz.

Gordon Campbell on Bill English, abroad

January 19th, 2017

First published on Werewolf

If David Cameron was the closest thing John Key had to a political mentor, their successors also share a whole lot in common. Theresa May and Bill English were both propelled into the top jobs as the result of unexpected resignations, and without much in the way of credible competition from their colleagues. Neither have yet been given a mandate to govern by the electorate although – in both countries – the Labour opposition is in less than robust shape.

In May’s case, one of her main qualifications for high office was her six years as a safe pair of hands at the Home Office. English too, has a reputation built on managerial competence, rather than excitement or innovation. Both politicians are – shall we say –flexible on matters of political ideology. Privately, both are religious, and what the Catholic Herald said of May a few months ago could equally be said of English:

May remains a regular churchgoer but she will never be someone who talks a great deal about her religious beliefs. Insofar as she wants people to know about her faith it is through works rather than words. 

Yet – and most importantly – it is difficult to grasp just what, if anything, lies beyond the veneer of competence. For New Zealanders there isn’t a challenge like Brexit that is dominating the political agenda, so there’s more time for contemplation of the leader that’s been thrust upon us. He does seems pleasant enough, but what’s he for, exactly?

Government policy seems to be running like one of those self-driving cars you read about, on settings that were devised years ago. Anyone could run it. If English is there mainly to ceremonially unveil the tax cuts on Budget Day in May, what should we do with him in the meantime? Send him overseas? Done. So English has just gone on a “Hi I’m Bill” tour to Europe. On his visit to Downing St, he was almost ridiculously undemanding of Theresa May, over her crackdown on Kiwis seeking to work in the UK. After all, English suggested, she’s a very busy woman with lots of far more important things on her plate than us.

Given the context, I think it would be quite unreasonable of us to expect some movement on the issue when they are trying to deal with large scale issues of immigrations and people flows with the EU.

He said that was at the core of the Brexit negotiations with the EU. “And much as we’d like them to pay more attention to us, I don’t expect we should push Mrs May’s good will too hard on that.

So we indicated that we will continue to advocate for easier access for Kiwis, but we wouldn’t expect we will get engagement on it until they’ve dealt with the bigger issues.”

Somehow, its hard to imagine an Australian politician being such a doormat while engaging with a British PM who had been cracking down on Australians. Last September Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop struck a steelier, more dignified tone in her visit to Britain, when addressing the same subject:

Ms Bishop said the ability to work, travel and study in the UK and vice versa is an essential part of such a close relationship. “Should we be in a position to conclude a free-trade agreement after Brexit well then obviously [improved access] can be the subject of a free-trade agreement.”

“It’s something we were able to achieve with the United States and I certainly look forward to increasing the number of business visas, student visas, work visas, between Australia and the UK.

Bishop had also firmly reminded the Brits that this relationship was a two way street:

“Australia is a significant investor in London in particular and the UK is a significant investor in Australia so we have an interest in ensuring that this relationship endures and that’s one way that it will do so.”

Regardless…here at home, English still got points for furthering New Zealand’s chances of a trade deal with the UK, post Brexit. Yet as one can see from the above, the Australians were already there pushing that same barrow months before, well ahead of us.

The time frame for this supposed triumph is also worth considering. If English thinks he is going to take care of the ‘Kiwis in the UK’ immigration issue via a trade deal with a free and independent Britain once the terms of Brexit are sorted out with the Europeans then….lets not hold our breath. Given the two year negotiating period once Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty has been triggered….that means we’d be lining up to talk with the Brits sometime around the election after the next election, and something concrete would finally emerge for voters to evaluate in about three elections from now. Grand work, Bill ! Evidently, this is a man who plays the long game.
Trading in Phantoms

The Australians are not the only ones lining up to negotiate with Britain, post Brexit, on trade. President-elect Donald Trump also thinks that a US/UK deal can be wrapped up pretty soon after Brexit, too. So New Zealand will be having some competition on that trade front, whenever May or her successor gets around to it. The only thing that could conceivably help us get to the front of a queue is that Britain – like China before it – might want to use New Zealand as the canary in the goldmine, in order to fashion an FTA prototype before going in to negotiate on that front with the guys who really matter.

Trump’s readiness to embrace Brexit as a great idea, (and to suggest an FTA with the Brits once the UK is shot of those pesky Europeans) is instructive. Keep in mind that Trump rejected the TPP on the grounds it didn’t deliver enough to US corporates and their workers. So any US/UK FTA is likely to be hard sledding for the Brits. On such issues as food safety for instance, the US currently falls well short of the standards set by those pernickety Germans – who don’t like drenching their chickens in chlorine or pumping their beef full of hormones, as the Americans are wont to do.

That will pose a further problem for May, in future. Once free of European demands for higher standards, how will Britain choose to proceed? Enter little, reliably pliable New Zealand, which likes to be liked by everyone. That’s going to be hard. Reportedly, we are trying to negotiate an FTA with the EU that will entail those same high standards and regulatory strictures, and also with a UK that will have just done its best to escape from them. So if we’re to be first cab off the rank (or very near to it) we will not want to be seen by the Europeans to be simultaneously colluding with Britain, especially in order to pursue the kind of laxer standards on trade that the US will be demanding.

So we do face a few difficult choices ahead on trade policy. Now that the TPP is all but dead, are we willing to further antagonise the Trump administration by pursuing the regional RCEP trade deal that includes China and India, but excludes the US? Elsewhere, will we line up with the Europeans on issues like phylo-sanitary standards – or with the emerging US/UK preference for 19th century standards on labour, the environment and food safety? English may be a pleasant fellow. But on Trump Planet, wanting to liked by everyone is for pussies.

Party time !

Only 48 hours to the Trump inaugural. It seems as if the A-list celebrities from Hell-ywood are agreed on boycotting the event. Despite Trump promising only last month on Twitter that mega-stars will be attending his inaugural galas, it now seems he’s dialing back expectations, making a virtue out of necessity, and will be running a more muted affair, while grumbling about the liberal glitterati. Sad !

As mentioned in this column the other day, country musician Toby Keith has been one of the few ‘stars’ willing to attend the Trump festivities, and his “ How Do You Like Me Now” hit is a stunningly apt song for the occasion. The other dimly recognizable name due to perform is the rock band 3 Doors Down. From their website, take a look at the band’s touring schedule for the next few months. In its own way, it speaks volumes :

And their one big hit “Kryptonite” also has some relevant lyrics:

If I go crazy then will you still
Call me Superman
If I’m alive and well, will you be
There holding my hand
I’ll keep you by my side with
My superhuman might
Kryptonite !

Talking of stars, and in another city…there’s always this to console us :

And here’s Ryan Gosling back when he was just a kid, bringing the (MC) Hammer down :

Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Scoopit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Print this post Print this post
    1. 9 Responses to “Gordon Campbell on Bill English, abroad”

    2. By Andrew Nichols on Jan 19, 2017 | Reply

      May remains a regular churchgoer but she will never be someone who talks a great deal about her religious beliefs. Insofar as she wants people to know about her faith it is through works rather than words.

      I wonder what “church” that is? Given her works to date, cuddling up to Saudi genocide in particular, it certainly is unlikely to be a Christian church. Disciple of tyhe Prince of Peace would find that abhorrent.

    3. By Mikey on Jan 19, 2017 | Reply

      Both careers of mid level bureaucratic management AKA lying for the Establishment.
      Both are pathological liars and sociopaths.
      http://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/chris-johns-theresa-may-continues-to-lie-about-brexit-1.2941575
      “When Theresa May says that the Leave campaign was crystal clear about exiting the single market she is lying.”
      Jet-setting European tour (at the taxpayers expense) for the Banksters Billy boy and austerity for the people.
      Both lairs say they are “Christian” but didn’t understand (or read) the manual .

    4. By Anabel on Jan 21, 2017 | Reply

      Since the Bank of England’s Crown is foreign
      we will always have a shadow govt “abroad” .
      Bankster Bill is just getting his instructions as PM of the Crown’s govt.

      Having a govt abroad, the Bank of England’s Crown means its only interest is protecting the status quo, commerce, trade and profit.
      That is why things are as they are.

      The economy is fully controlled by the banksters, Everything that happens to our economy is due to the banksters loaning money (or contracting the economy).
      The govt has convinced people of the importance of corporate trade, that with bankster currency manipulations,with the sell off of national assets to foreign nations , with the monopolies and a banking ponzi scheme in-place that the Crown’s profit off NZ export trade is important to the people(debt slaves).

    5. By Troy K on Jan 23, 2017 | Reply

      Blinglish may as well stay in the City of London.
      He is probably being indoctrinated into the Whitehall ring ( a NZ judge was sent over to do the cover up).

    6. By Anabel on Jan 23, 2017 | Reply

      @ Troy, he may as well stay as the Crown just got one the other party stooges to deliver the state of the nation speech .
      Anyone of the political parties can deliver the PM’s speech which is full of lies.
      Though they imposed an austerity program on the people, the govt says everything is better than ever . The Crown are not disclosing that they mean their economic contraction and cuts( employment, health and social welfare )is better just for the E$tablishment.
      Apparently the Crown nz govt does not factor in the middle class or the poor as part of the people of this nation.

    7. By Helen S on Jan 23, 2017 | Reply

      The Govt’s State of Planet Key Nation speech says it is better because the govt said so .

      The facts are that since the banking cabal’s contraction of the NZ economy the NZ economy has contracted.
      In NZ there are more people living in poverty,more people are paying unfair rents, there are worse health outcomes and more people are homeless. While the NZ PM experiencing no austerity swans around England on holiday.

    8. By Robert M on Jan 23, 2017 | Reply

      Yes and No. Theresa May is an authentic Tory, probably the most generally acceptable since Baldwin to the Broad Church. Saying that I thing Churchill would have approved of Nigel Farange as an acceptable little England Tory and found him much more authentic than Heath or Cameron. Bill English is a Catholic socialist County Party conservative but to me English disowns both liberal wings of the National Party both the neo liberal economic market wing and the liberal social faction of the McLays, Julian Watts, Waring , Minogue. Above all Bill is boring and in in the wrong party. English has built the party on the popularity of South Island milk expansion. No theres nothing interesting about Bill English.
      I would favour priority of new trade treaties with the UK and Japan. We remain outside of Auckland little more than a displaced English colony. Most in the UK for the EEC appear to be real estate landlords, eurotrash or english farmers,Scots or Irish on the EEC teat.

    9. By Alexandra on Jan 24, 2017 | Reply

      The Crown is the Bank of England’s entity.
      Both Teressa May and Bill are Establishment tools.
      Both tell the public they are Christian when their actions are not Christian( sic).
      On a positive note, if the people of NZ see the Crown as an illegitimate government and stop supporting it change can happen.

    10. By Anabel on Jan 24, 2017 | Reply

      The Bank of England’s corporations dictate the trade agreements .

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.