Scoop Election 08: edited by Gordon Campbell


Gordon Campbell's blog updates are now published at Werewolf.co.nz.

Gordon Campbell on trade, Trump and Steve Bannon

November 18th, 2016

First published on Werewolf

As APEC leaders get together this weekend in Peru, they could be forgiven for looking back nostalgically at Barack Obama’s time in office and wondering whether the world will ever be quite so safe and prosperous again. Because if anyone can further bankrupt America and send the global economy into a tailspin it would be serial bankruptee come President-elect Donald Trump – and the outlook really isn’t all that good. Promising huge increases in military and infrastructural spending at the same time as you’re also promising to cut income and corporate taxes looks like Reagan-era looniness is back in fashion.

You know the drill. Time and again – see Reagan in the 1980s, the state of Kansas today – the ideologues of the right cut regulations and deliver tax cuts in the simple minded faith that this will unleash a wave of entrepreneurialism that will lift everyone’s boat. It doesn’t work. Reagan failed, and that failure sunk his immediate successor, the hapless George H. W. “Read My Lips, No New Taxes” Bush who had to break his promise on taxes in order to protect the revenue. Bill Clinton raised taxes and the US prospered. Dubya cut them again, ruinously. Barack Obama restored some sobriety after the GFC, just in time for Trump to come along and promise another foolhardy spending spree and tax cutting raid on the revenue. There are very good reasons to be afraid of the consequences. In effect, US voters have just put the levers of the world economy into the hands of a failed businessman who has repeatedly shown a cavalier attitude towards the care of other peoples money.

So there are reasons to be nervous in Peru. With understandable trepidation, the APEC leaders will be waiting to see how much of President-elect Donald Trump’s inflammatory campaign rhetoric will be enacted once he’s in the White House. For New Zealand, trade policy will be a litmus test. Over recent weeks, the Key government has continued to pass legislation to enact the Trans Pacific Partnership deal that Trump has vowed to scuttle. Arguably, we would be better off shifting our focus to the rival regional trade deal being promoted by China and India.

Currently, trade policy is not a top priority for the Trump transition team. Cutting taxes, and scrapping Obamacare are their main concerns… and gee, its proving to be tougher than they thought. How do you keep the bits of Obamacare that the voters like, while scrapping the bits that are ideologically impure? Answer: you can’t. In this respect, the Trump people are exactly like Boris Johnson – who is still discovering the hard way that you can’t actually keep all the good bits of being in the EU, after you’ve dumped the immigration-related ‘free movement of people’ bits that you didn’t like. It’s a cruel world like that. People don’t give you everything you want.

Trade policy matters to us, though. We’re a trading nation. Ultimately, the Key government will have to make a call (and plan accordingly) on whether Trump seriously aims to scrap the TPP or alternatively, wants to change it in a way that serves US corporate interests more comprehensively.

If Trump does choose to “fix” the TPP, what extra concessions would New Zealand be prepared to make? All year, Republican Party chieftains have railed against the TPP’s claimed ‘failures.’ Supposedly, the current agreement (a) fails to crack down on alleged currency manipulation by China (b) allows member nations to regulate tobacco marketing for health reasons and (c) fails to provide US drug companies with a long enough term of market dominance for their new medicines. All grievous sins, in Republican eyes.

Should New Zealand agree to meekly comply with such changes, in order to retain our modest gains on dairy access? Hell no. Conceding on medicine patents could cost us millions. Targeting China over its currency would also be fraught with risk. Arguably, Trump’s criticisms are largely out of date. He’s railing against a historical problem that no longer exists. Yes, between 2004-2011, China certainly did keep its currency artificially low to boost its exports, but not so much recently. If anything, China’s leaders have been frantically pumping money into the country’s currency, to keep it from falling even faster.

There’s a wider issue. To indulge Trump, can we afford to endorse a trade war that he may want to pick with China, which is our biggest export destination? Australia and New Zealand both rely heavily on demand from China to keep their economies afloat. Enough concerns already exist about China’s debt problems and mortgage bubble without Trump throwing another spanner into the works. For that reason, New Zealand should be telling Trump point blank that any TPP “fix” that targets China’s currency is not something that we could support.

There is another option. The major trade deal currently on the table is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Unlike the TPP, this pact includes China and India. It has real flaws: the investor-state dispute resolution mechanisms are just as dangerous and obsolete. But at least the RCEP is not saddled with the copyright issues and drug patent problems that have plagued the TPP – and which always had more to do with enshrining market dominance for US corporates than with fostering genuine free trade. However, the RCEP doesn’t include the US, and New Zealand would be left without a trade pact with the Americans. Hey, maybe we could apply to join NAFTA. That’s up for grabs again, under Trump.

Trade, as the old saying goes, is war by other means. Both the TPP and RCEP are platforms for advancing strategic influence in the region as much as they are about fostering free trade. Question being: does our future lie with our traditional allies, or with Asia? For a few more months, we can still enjoy the luxury of keeping both of those trade balls in the air – but if Trump follows through on his rhetoric, choosing sides is likely to become a necessity. Which way will we jump?

America, Still Not So Great

While we’re mulling over our choices on trade…here’s a scary quote on Defence from someone tipped for one of the top national security adviser posts in the new Trump administration:

Widely considered to have made the short list of candidates for top national security jobs in Donald Trump’s administration, Rep. Duncan Hunter of Alpine pledged Friday to make the Pentagon great again after eight years of Democratic control.

“I’m excited about a warrior culture, a warrior mentality put back into the (military), as opposed to a corporate culture ruled over by the bureaucrats and lawyers,” Hunter, a Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee, said in a phone interview.

“The warrior culture is going to get infused into (the department) again. It’s probably going to take a while because a lot of guys who had that mentality are no longer there, but maybe people’s true colors can show now, a little bit,” he added.

Once were Pentagon warriors, will be so again. This next bit is both creepy and scary. Steve Bannon, the guy who turned Breibart News into a cesspit of US journalism has just been appointed as Trump’s chief strategist and senior counsellor. At the Foreign Policy site, David Rothkopf has compiled a useful list of some of the headlines that Breibart ran under Bannon’s tutelage. For example:

“Bill Kristol: Republican Spoiler, Renegade Jew,” “There’s No Hiring Bias Against Women in Tech, They Just Suck at Interviews,” “Gabby Giffords: The Gun Control Movement’s Human Shield,” “Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy,” “Roger Stone: Huma Abedin ‘Most Likely a Saudi Spy’ With ‘Deep, Inarguable Connections’ to ‘Global Terrorist Entity,’ “The Solution to Online ‘Harassment’ Is Simple: Women Should Just Log Off” “Data: Young Muslims in the West are a Ticking Time Bomb, Increasingly Sympathizing with Radicals, Terror” etc etc

And of course Bannon’s classic effort: “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer…?” The misogyny in those headlines – not to mention the xenophobia and the anti-Semitism – has been a constant theme with this guy. Newsweek has also reported on a raft of other incidents involving Bannon’s hostility to women:

During a 2011 radio interview, he said that progressives vilify prominent women in the conservative movement because they are not “a bunch of dykes that came from the Seven Sisters schools…..”Bannon also fired a disabled employee on maternity leave, according to a lawsuit obtained by The New York Post. “Julia Panely-Pacetti, a new mother who suffers from multiple sclerosis, was terminated by defendants from her position as head of public relations and corporate marketing because of her sex and her disability,” states the lawsuit, filed in Manhattan federal court in September 2005. Panely-Pacetti was… reporting directly to Bannon. The claim was settled in 2006.

There are also allegations of sexual harassment and threats of violence :

…During the 1990s, Bannon was accused of sexual harassment. The suit related to Bannon’s time as director of Biosphere 2, a research facility in Oracle, Arizona. The company’s former director, Margret Augustine, claimed that…. Bannon and a fellow banker, Martin Bowen, had made “sexually suggestive remarks and lewd remarks toward her, and had disparaged female employees of the research facility,” Buzzfeed News reported.

Augustine claimed Bannon once said that the problem with an employee was that she “was a woman in a man’s job” and he often openly discussed women’s “boobs,” calling them “titties.” At a company party, Augustine claims she danced with Bannon and he “held my wrist tightly and told me that once I’d done it with him, I’d never want to do it with anyone else.” In recordings obtained by BuzzFeed News, Bannon referred to a female colleague as a “bimbo” and vowed to take comments the woman made about the safety of the research facility they worked at and “ram it down her fucking throat.”

Clearly, once Steve Bannon enables Donald Trump to make America great again, women will be put back in their place.

Decisions, Decisions.

TPP or RCEP… it isn’t easy being John Key on the trade policy options. He’d like a threesome with China – heck, a full blown 12 member TPP pool party would be great – but Donald is just so jealous. It looks like its gonna have to be China or the US, sometime soon. Here’s a song about how hard it is for New Zealand to come to a decision – TPP or RCEP? – on where its trade interests and inclinations would be better served:

Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Scoopit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Print this post Print this post
    1. 5 Responses to “Gordon Campbell on trade, Trump and Steve Bannon”

    2. By David on Nov 18, 2016 | Reply

      I think The Loving Spoonful are on the cusp of being rediscovered for more great music than just Summer In The City

    3. By Anabel on Nov 18, 2016 | Reply

      There is nothing wrong with ‘America’.
      There is nothing wrong with ‘Russia’.

      What is “wrong” is the psychopaths/bankers that run the corporation, with these tools like Trump and their media they infect people with ignorance.
      Make people think that the corporations trade agreements, dictatorships and growth (in a central banking ponzi scheme) somehow benefits the debt slaves.

      Nothing the pentagon has ever done has been in the warrior spirit.Invading the middle east on a lie, starting unlawful wars, bombing civilians, making refugees these are the actions of insane greedy profiteering warmongers not a of a warrior .

    4. By Helen S on Nov 22, 2016 | Reply

      @ Anabel, I agree, the globalization agenda does continue .
      The US political system is beyond a bad joke. It is surreal like a Dali painting , ignorant people still believe and think these evil lying criminals and politicians/ celebrities are going to save the world(with a big fence?!).
      And do be believe there really is a democracy just because we are told we have one?
      Does democracy exist in the USA/NZ just because the oligarchy’s corporations (re)write the TPPA and pass it in Feb 2017!!?
      A democracy because the Key Bankster signed the TPPA amidst mass protests? That was a demon-cracy in action.

    5. By Anabel on Nov 22, 2016 | Reply

      Obama does not officially leave office until Jan. 20, 2017. New congress in Feb, we still have a live (re)written unlawful corporate governance agreement .

      Trump is a liar, he did not scrap the unlawful mandatory insurance, he will probably (if not switched out on Dec 19th by the oligarchy’s electoral collage) flip and pass the TPPA .
      A trust agreement for a global corporate governance system.
      Which in the “demon-cracy” (the oligarchy’s system of governance) John Key signed.

    6. By Drunken bum on Nov 25, 2016 | Reply

      @Anabel,
      The Electoral College goes back to the 1787 Convention, where banker’s delegates “distrusted the passions of people” to select a president. Incidentally the Democrats in Congress are moving ahead to try to dismantle the electoral college.
      The media based emotive electoral process is a process that remains totally unfair and biased.
      Those that owns and control the media runs this passion stirring propaganda .And they run all the horses( trump/Clinton) in the race to ensure a win.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.