Scoop Election 08: edited by Gordon Campbell

Gordon Campbell's blog updates are now published at

Gordon Campbell on The Rise of the Sewbots

September 9th, 2016

First published on Werewolf

Of late, we’ve all heard a lot of anxious media talk about how automation is poised to wipe out the white collar office jobs on which middle class incomes and lifestyles depend. The looming social upheaval forms a big part of the argument for the Universal Basic Income proposal.

However, virtually no coverage has been devoted to how automation is starting to wipe out millions of the jobs in the footwear and garment sweatshops of Asia. Yes, the same sweatshops that, for all their notoriously bad aspects, still enable huge numbers of people in Cambodia, Vietnam, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia etc to avoid utter destitution.

Not for much longer. The ‘sewbots’ are coming. A report by the International Labour Organisation last week contains the grim details. On current projections, the ILO estimates, some two thirds of the 9.2 million jobs in Southeast Asia’s textile and footwear sectors stand to be wiped out by automation – and that means about 64% of such jobs in Indonesia, 86% in Vietnam and 88% in Cambodia. In other words, the era of clothing and footwear multinationals moving their factories to Asia to take advantage of cheap and plentiful labour is coming to an end. Unfortunately, no safety net exists for the workers (and their families) who rely on these jobs. The wider economies of the ASEAN countries involved will also suffer: clearly, if there is no need for cheap Asian labour anymore, there is no pressing need to have the factories based in Asia at all. As Bloomberg News recently noted, we are already seeing this trend unfold with Adidas:

Collectively, Cambodia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Viet Nam represent 55 per cent of the company’s overall source market. In 2016, Adidas successfully tested a fully automated shoe factory (also known as “Speedfactory”) using 3D technology and robotics in Germany. Adidas plans to open the second Speedfactory in the United States in 2017. Speedfactory is part of Adidas’ efforts to individualize sportswear and react quicker to consumer needs by bringing manufacturing closer to its clients and speeding up delivery. While time will tell if Speedfactory is widely successful, its profitability could usher a new trend of footwear companies using advanced manufacturing techniques to produce goods closer to point of sale.

The automation process – the sewbots work faster 24/7, are more precise and make fewer mistakes – is happening in unison with other productivity enhancing processes such as ‘lean manufacturing’ and ‘fast fashion.’ Multinationals like the Spanish clothing and accessories retailer Zara are reportedly investing in in-house electronic monitoring processes that enable factories to adjust factory volumes, to pursue quick turnarounds, to sustain short production lines, to enable the running down of inventory and crucially… to locate the supply chain closer to the main markets. Obviously, customers will still need to be serviced in the emerging middle classes of Asia – but even bigger economic gains can be won by basing these automated garment footwear and accessories factories back within the traditional markets of Europe and the United States. Bloomberg, again:

Nowhere is that shift clearer than in Cambodia. Since the mid-1990s, global manufacturers have off-shored production there to take advantage of the country’s low wages, loose regulation and large population of rural residents eager for wage-paying jobs in the city. The result was a boom: By 2015, textile and footwear exports had become a $6.3 billion industry. They now account for about 80 percent of Cambodia’s export revenue.

Under the best conditions, textile and footwear jobs are monotonous and uncomfortable (as they’ve been since the Victorian era). Under the worst, they can be degrading and life-threatening. Nonetheless, Cambodia’s 630,000 textile and footwear workers have prospered. From 2014 to 2015, their average wage rose from $145 a month to $175, in a country where per-capita income is about $1,000 a year. That trend has repeated itself across Asia, especially in the great garment-making centres of China and Vietnam.

Low, but rising wages at a time of falling prices? Something has had to give. That’s how the downward spiral now picking up speed across Asia first began:

Increasing competition from low-wage economies has pushed down garment prices worldwide. The average cost of clothing exported from Cambodia to the U.S. fell by 24 percent between 2006 and 2015. For a manufacturer, that’d be hard to swallow if wages were static; when wages are rising, it threatens to become a crisis.

Caught in that rising wages/falling price vise, and given that they had little leverage against the brands [Nike etc] Asia’s garment-makers themselves began the resort to automation which is, as Bloomberg also points out, the ultimate productivity booster. Asia now stands to bear the full impact as this process gathers up pace :

The economics for brands and retailers to place local manufacturing centres closer to major markets will become stronger, making next day delivery possible for consumers. Because of this potential to please consumers in ways previously not possible, big players are re-evaluating their supply chain to cope with faster product design, personalization and production cycles. ASEAN factories that form part of the current off-shored supplier model will increasingly be less needed.

Obviously, this process will generate a great deal of suffering – and social instability – in what were already poor and politically unstable countries.


Money for Miramar

Here’s an interesting story from the local government campaign trail, in Wellington. Mayoral aspirant Nick Leggett has vowed to shut down what he calls a $3 million ‘slush fund’ whereby a group within the Wellington City Council doles out public funds to those it deems worthy, even if in some cases it also refuses for reasons of commercial sensitivity(!) to disclose exactly how much some recipients have received, or what kind of return the public got from its fund investments. (In fact, the group of councillors involved reportedly have to sign a confidentiality agreement not to disclose to ratepayers how they’d disbursed the cash.)

Among the recipients is the Miramar Film Events Trust, which was given $95,000. Go to the Miramar Events Trust website and you find a front page featuring a photo of Oscar winning editor and Roxy Theatre/CoCo restaurant co-founder Jamie Selkirk, Roxy theatre/CoCo restaurant co-owner Valentina Dias and Trust manager Kristy Grant, who is responsible for the overall management of the Trust and its projects, notably including the Roxy5 Short Film Competition – a schools based film competition run in conjunction with Capital E and which culminates in an annual gala premiere held in May at… the Roxy theatre/CoCo restaurant complex. Among the other worthy projects cited on the Trust website is the Miramarvellous Festival, which (among other things) celebrates local restaurants, with the CoCo restaurant prominently featured.

Grand. The charitable activities being subsidised by Council do seem to be linked fairly openly to the businesses run by the people behind the Trust. So I guess everyone’s a winner, right? Although $95,000 does seem quite a lot when the Council donates say, only $5,000 towards the Wellington International Film Festival.

Oh, and Nick Leggett will not exactly be shutting down the so-called slush fund, if and when he’s elected mayor on October 8. Reportedly, Leggett is “pledging to abolish [the fund] and redirect the ratepayer cash into a strategy for tackling the “challenges” faced by Wellington’s CBD.” Which is quite different. Or kind of different. Or not at all different.


Gospel to soul, and beyond

For decades, people have recognised the role the black church played in the formation of soul, and in influencing subsequent forms of secular music. Here’s a classic example of the crossover. From 1909, here are the Fisk Jubilee Singers doing the spiritual ‘Couldn’t Hear Nobody Pray’

While still in church in 1964, the Womack brothers did their own arrangement of ‘Couldn’t Hear Nobody Pray’

Shortly afterwards the Womacks began to call themselves the Valentinos; they wrote secular lyrics to the same old tune, called it ‘Lookin’ For A Love’ and enjoyed a minor mid-1960s soul hit with it. Finally, in the early 1970s, Bobby Womack had a huge international hit with a revival of the same old song. The song had travelled a long way – and in some respects, no distance at all – from church.

Content Sourced from
Original url

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Scoopit
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Print this post Print this post
    1. 12 Responses to “Gordon Campbell on The Rise of the Sewbots”

    2. By Malcolm on Sep 9, 2016 | Reply

      What better time for a comprehensive re-appraisal of our whole attitude to clothes & fashion. Did you see the film “Slowing Down Fast Fashion” by Alex James? It is getting to the point where it is costing more to landfill our clothes than it is to make them.

    3. By Alexandra on Sep 11, 2016 | Reply

      The inequality from the central bankers financial system will not be fixed by those that also own the corporations. They are in control of the nation and its economy through the act of loaning it money with interest.

      Saving money by scrapping the administration and security costs of msd and winz with its clients saying ” WINZ want me dead” .
      An unconditional benefit for unemployment and social welfare. The people would feel better and outcomes would improve as employment numbers and outcomes are not related to WINZ, WINZ don’t create or provide any jobs .
      They just knock people off the benefit to make themselves look good.

    4. By mutyala on Sep 11, 2016 | Reply

      Pathetic how local and central government acquiesce to the big shots in the film industry, doling out anti-union laws, government limos, and just straight cash.

      If we want a genuine film industry here, the ONLY way is to invest in infrastructure (sound stages etc) and increase tax rebates. The ONLY way.

      Simply giving these guys money just reveals the govt to be starry-eyed suckers and makes those studio execs dream up new ways to grab public monkey for amusement.

    5. By Helen S on Sep 12, 2016 | Reply

      @Alexandra, yes the fact is the ministry of social development (MSD) dis-empowers people who are experiencing difficult circumstances. It pulls people down.
      WINZ does not even provide the services it is contracted to provide, doesn’t create jobs, doesn’t get people jobs and doesn’t change the reality of the economy driven job market.
      And they are not even held to account for privacy breaches or performance ( which is just them knocking poor people off the benefit to get the numbers they want)nor is their continued existence questioned.

    6. By john common on Sep 12, 2016 | Reply

      The other factor to consider (from a purely NZ terms of trade point of view) is what impact this will have for NZ exports to the region. If the emerging middle-classe in Asia either fails to materialise or experiences a significant turn-around in their prospects – this must impact on their appetite for NZ exports in general and NZ dairy in particular.

    7. By Mikey on Sep 13, 2016 | Reply

      john you think this why? because you believe blinglish propaganda that life is all about corporate controlled resources -trade -imports and exports?!!

    8. By john common on Sep 13, 2016 | Reply

      Hi Mikey. Errr … no, not really. Just pointing out that the likely ill-effects referred by Gordon Campbell are likely to have a direct impact here, notwithstanding that we pretty much eliminated the clothing/textile sector that use to employ a fair number of people locally.

    9. By Mikey on Sep 14, 2016 | Reply

      I did not say it would not effect us. We live on a sphere, what is happening everywhere effects us (like the perpetual wars that cost much more than the clothing/textile sector).
      We are and will be effected by all the suffering and pain that is being inflicted in the name of growth of corporate profit.

      I was pointing out the borg like thinking
      the ar*e faced bankster finance minister has helped conditioned people to think, to think in terms of loss/gain for the Crown NZ govt,have a focus of GDP/trade.

      We are already experiencing the ill effects of this type of corporate thinking and the lack of a sovereign govt that would act in our interest.
      You’ve been conditioned to be concerned about corporate trade, GDP and commerce.
      Ironically you seem to be worried about the profits of the same banker owned corporations that wrote the TPPA,that exploit and outsource low labor costs to pretty much end our clothing and textile industry. Corporations that are now using labour saving sewbots to again to try to lower labor costs.

    10. By Anabel on Sep 14, 2016 | Reply

      @ Mikey The same corporations that appear to be controlling the Crown NZ govt corporation.
      The New Zealand Government: A U.S. SEC Registered Corporation.

    11. By john common on Sep 14, 2016 | Reply

      Mikey – the alacrity with which some people pigeon-hole others is surprising.

    12. By Mikey on Sep 14, 2016 | Reply

      john you have not been pigeon -holed. As I said I agree with Gordon in that we are all effected by planetary “causes”. I do not even subscribe to thinking people can be “pigeon -holed”.

      Anabel, yes the very same Crown corporation which is working for the other banker owned corporations.
      Tricking people into consenting to the oligarchy’s status quo, registering their vote with the govt, believing in “democracy” with evidence to the contrary , to worry about the GDP when Bankster Bill says to, to believe the govt and its ministers (even after been shown that the govt lies) and to be ignorant obedient debt slaves.

    13. By Alexandra on Sep 19, 2016 | Reply

      Cuba Dupa is just another Cuba st retailer handout, its not an “eco-asset” as the WCC tells people it is. In fact the majority of WCC funding( ratepayer debt) appears to target select wealthy pockets = one big slush fund.
      With this years abysmal selection of WCC candidates (looking very “unrepresentative” of the majority of ratepayers) it really is a case of ” no matter who you vote for the govt always gets in” .
      I am not voting (not supporting the WCC or the unfair and biased govt process) and yet was still told by a WCC candidate( who was busy lying and promising the moon ) to vote for the “least evil” as though “evil” is his new word for his choice of representative.
      What is wrong with people nowdays? The one time they have the power to change things they do not accept they just keep doing the same thing over and over thinking the results will be different= insanity. Voting for what has been described as operating as an oligarchy (WCC)… not as a democracy.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.