Comments on: The RWC resolution, and ACC changes http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/15/gordon-campbell-on-the-rwc-resolution-acc-changes/ Edited by Gordon Campbell Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:45:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anti-trolling http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/15/gordon-campbell-on-the-rwc-resolution-acc-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-11862 Anti-trolling Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:31:51 +0000 http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/15/gordon-campbell-on-the-rwc-resolution-acc-changes/#comment-11862 Mr Hide- I think by now we know about the obscene 'financial incentives' that are provided by foreign insurance corporations to deal makers. I don't think it is a "Better deal" -except for greedy little goblins. http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/smith039s-acc-figures-smoke-and-mirrors-independent-review-needed/5/26940 A solution for ACC's poor claimant outcomes and the declining rehabilitation rate would be to move ACC focus away from the US insurance model (scheme exiting and denials) and back to the Woodhouse principles. Mr Hide- I think by now we know about the obscene ‘financial incentives’ that are provided by foreign insurance corporations to deal makers.
I don’t think it is a “Better deal” -except for greedy little goblins.

http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/smith039s-acc-figures-smoke-and-mirrors-independent-review-needed/5/26940

A solution for ACC’s poor claimant outcomes and the declining rehabilitation rate would be to move ACC focus away from the US insurance model (scheme exiting and denials) and back to the Woodhouse principles.

]]> By: Ernesto H http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/15/gordon-campbell-on-the-rwc-resolution-acc-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-11855 Ernesto H Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:41:52 +0000 http://gordoncampbell.scoop.co.nz/2009/10/15/gordon-campbell-on-the-rwc-resolution-acc-changes/#comment-11855 Sorry I couldn't give a toss about the latest steps to prioritization a more expensive way to "free view" Rugby. ACC is a publicly owned scheme. 1)These levy increases are not seen as affordable. 2)The proposed levy rises are not based on the number of injuries and cost of claims. I/We have not seen the preposed legislative changes but I am sure they are designed to be very attractive to a foreign multi-national insurance corporation. Please take a minute to give your input to the very addled and confused Nick- before ACC is Nicked. consultation@acc.co.nz & nick.smith@parliament.govt.nz Sorry I couldn’t give a toss about the latest steps to prioritization a more expensive way to “free view” Rugby.

ACC is a publicly owned scheme.
1)These levy increases are not seen as affordable.
2)The proposed levy rises are not based on the number of injuries and cost of claims.
I/We have not seen the preposed legislative changes but I am sure they are designed to be very attractive to a foreign multi-national insurance corporation.
Please take a minute to give your input to the very addled and confused Nick- before ACC is Nicked.

consultation@acc.co.nz & nick.smith@parliament.govt.nz

]]>